Christopher ‘Ludacris’ Bridges is at an impasse these days regarding the custody battle over his new child.
Does he continue to fight the Tamika Fuller, the mother of his infant daughter, for full custody or does he fork over thousands in child support each month?
In the meantime, the Atlanta-based rapper feels that the media attention he and his new baby mama have been receiving may be ruining his career, so now he’s asking the court to keep it all on the low while they sort it all out.
Court documents obtained by Radar Online reveal that Ludacris claims he has been ?publicly humiliated? all because his baby mama Tamika Fuller isn?t happy with the amount of child support the Georgia guidelines calculate he pay.
?Because the media is able to read and misinterpret the documents in the Court?s file in this case, every day since Jan. 1, 2014, I have been publicly humiliated and called a deadbeat dad, who does not want to see or support his minor child. Nothing could be further from the truth,? the entrepreneur, born Christopher Brian Bridges, said.
[FLASHBACK: Ludacris Welcomes New Baby for the New Year… ]
Ludacris claims that despite the fact that Fuller, who gave birth to their baby in December 2013, has not allowed him to see their daughter, he?d already paid almost $3,500 in child support before their daughter was two weeks old.
In the court filings, Ludacris also noted a TMZ story titled ?Ludacris Baby Mama ? You Treat Our Kid Worse Than a Dog,? saying it appears to be the media?s goal to tear down his reputation.
?In the event that an ex parte order is not granted, and people are able to continue to read and misinterpret the documents in the Court?s file, my name, reputation, character, goodwill and brand will continue to suffer irreversible harm and damage, which may eventually jeopardize my earning potential,? he said.
I’m confused. It’s not like anyone is making the stories up. It’s almost seems like Luda is blaming the ‘media’ on his baby mama drama.
Shouldn’t he be more concerned with the welfare of his new child than his ‘reputation’? Perhaps one?prophylactic ?and some spermacide could have avoided all of this…